Experts Deliver One-Two
Punch to Critics of Medical Malpractice Insurers
Rockville, MD
– April 27, 2006
– Newly released expert research reveals that consumer groups’ criticisms
of the medical malpractice insurance industry contain systematic flaws
and the intentional misuse of industry data.
"This new research points out the gross
manipulation and blatant misrepresentation employed by these personal
injury lawyer-oriented groups in order to pursue their self-serving
political agenda,” said Lawrence Smarr, president of the Physician
Insurers Association of America.
“Pricing and Reserving Practices in Medical
Malpractice Insurance,” authored by university insurance department
chairs Robert E. Hoyt, PhD, and Lawrence S. Powell, PhD, soundly rebuts
a December report issued by the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer
Rights entitled, “False Accounting: How Medical Malpractice Insurance
Companies Inflate Losses to Justify Sudden Surges in Rates and Tort
Reform.”
Harvey Rosenfield, consumer activist and author of “False
Accounting,” analyzed selective data to conclude that medical
malpractice insurers overstated their loss projections by $15 billion
between 1995 and 2003. Hoyt and Powell demonstrate that losses for this
period are actually understated by $4.3 billion, with actual payments in
1998 and 1999 already exceeding initial loss estimates.
“The consumer groups’ reports have been
intentionally crafted in an attempt to fool Congress and the media into
believing that the current medical liability system works,” said Smarr.
“But the system best serves lawyers and leaves real victims waiting
years for compensation.”
A second new research report, entitled “Observations
on February 28, 2006 Report by Americans for Insurance Reform (AIR)”
and authored by actuaries James Hurley and Gail Tverberg of Tillinghast
Towers Perrin, finds that past rate increases reflect the claims
experience of insurers and that recent tort reforms have had a material
effect on rates.
In the AIR study, “Insurance ‘Crisis’ Officially
Over - Medical Malpractice Rates Have Been Stable for a Year,” authors
J. Robert Hunter and Joanne Doroshow rely on survey data published by
the Council of Insurance Agents and Brokers (CIAB) to conclude that
insurance rates are no longer rising, and that state tort reforms have
had no effect.
The contents of this report were rebutted not only by
Hurley and Tverberg, but also by the CIAB. While Hurley and Tverberg
agree that rates may have flattened for the time being, they conclude
that current rates for physicians may be unsustainable in the long run
and that a lack of new entrants into the malpractice insurance market
suggests that the current rate level may be too low to compensate for
underlying risks.
The Hoyt & Powell and Tillinghast studies were
funded by the PIAA in response to the consumer group studies.
Copies of the reports may be found at: www.piaa.us.
The
PIAA is an association of doctor/provider owned and/or operated medical
liability insurance companies which insure over 60 percent of
America’s private practicing physicians as well as dentists,
hospitals, and other healthcare providers.